Doctor Who: Wood for the Trees

From the previews I thought this would go down a spooky girl fairy tale path, influenced by William Blake (Tyger Tyger!). Easy to assume with the kid in the red coat running around through the woods, and with the wolves, and the deliberate spoken references to Hansel and Gretel. This current series does like making it ultra clear with the telling (Clara-fying) doesn’t it, when it could’ve been left up to the acting and stage craft. Then I thought it was some kid of inner world childhood version of Clara. However, In the Forest of the Night was not the fairy tale, but a happier version of the Nicholas Cage film Knowing, which is high concept solid SF story as well as really, really depressing. The fairy tale overlay is explained as folk memory. We do remember the fear, and invent the story when the facts disappear.

In the Forest of the Night

In the Forest of the Night


If I may digress to Knowing. It was directed by Alex Proyas* and you could put his films Knowing together with Dark City to explain his vision of the end of the world and how anyone might survive it. Apparently tall, slim off-putting pale psychic alien men are mostly involved. Who are slightly different to the Promethean tall white alien beings. Sigh.

Any who, Doctor Who is sometimes a vehicle of a kind of Proyas-lite. Not quite at the level of the Gothic murder mayhem of The Crow, but still, as a ‘family show’ it ventures into dark places at times. Comedy though, and flirting, lighten the mood. Importantly, most endings if not triumphant, at least see some survive. Hopefully not just because it’s a serial.

Speaking of Proyas, IMDb has this to say of his themes: ‘often involve people who can’t be entirely certain of their own natures or the world around them’.  Well, yes. That’s The Doctor isn’t it? A man not entirely certain of his own evolving nature,  popping up on worlds he isn’t always sure of? But it goes to human nature too. Time and again it’s human nature that’s in flux, making a lie of the world. We see this with the multiple Claras across time and space. And I’ve a hunch this is what the finale is about. Who and perhaps what Clara is or being used for.

More than anything though as nice it was to see Clara and Danny’s relationship define itself, and Danny do stuff. I now suspect this is to heighten the impact of the finale though.  The Doctor and Clara’s conversation towards the end was a highlight too. However, the episode was not without its flaws. Like where are the Londoners? And would an entire world do the bidding of one girl? Why not have The Doctor (and girl) contact Unit, for instance?

For all the running around, world in peril stuff, this episode felt a bit like a pleasant interlude while we’re waiting for the big main event. This is the trouble with writing an interesting high concept story and have it play out, only to be completely be overtaken by the last-minute preview of the next episode, which seems to turn everything about Clara upside down. If I had been the writer I would’ve been a bit peeved. Maybe it’s a matter of having a different kind of preview for this kind of reveal, or not having the preview tacked onto the end of the episode. 


An accurate depiction of the world if the trees stay.

An accurate depiction of the world if the trees stay.

*As an Australian, it’s great spotting the well-known and not so well-known Australian actors Proyas uses in his films including Play School’s legendary Benita Collings).

2 thoughts on “Doctor Who: Wood for the Trees

  1. I have to admit, first off, that I’ve been loving your commentary on S08 in particular & the broader Whoniverse(?) in general, so thank you very much – I always find your insights grounded in a genuine love of the show, which I share.
    Something occurred to me today about the opener, and 12’s line about “who frowned me this face?” and the significance of trying to tell yourself (the Doctor) something so important that it would influence a regeneration. It’s been mooted elsewhere that Moffat asked RTD about a theory to explain Capaldi’s previous appearances in Dr Who & Torchwood, and I’ve wondered in particular about Ten’s (Donna inspired, insisted?) rescue of Capaldi’s Roman family from the fires of Pompeii — how the Doctor “saved” them from otherwise certainly perishing on volcano day. Does this echo or mirror what Missy seems to be doing, saving people that actually have died ~ or immediately prior to certain death ~ and taking them to the Nethersphere..??
    Is this perhaps a link or clue that the Doctor needs to remind himself of, do you think?

    On another, potentially related note, I have a niggling fear that Capaldi’s tenure as the Doctor may mirror that of Eccleston’s single season span – whereas 9 primed the pump and successfully carried off the re-boot, building a bridge for a new audience and to a new new Doctor, I wonder if 12’s purpose is to reassure the audience that Who-ever ‘plays’ the Doctor is ‘the same character’ [Capaldi’s wonderful performance is such an amalgam/homage to his predecessors] therefore paving the way for a potentially successor – whether that be of gender or race…
    Personally, I believe it’d be an early waste of the re-gen cycle – but if it took the show into a fresh direction (and possibly post- Moffat) then Capaldi’s gravitas may provide the Eccleston-factor.
    I’d really like Capaldi to do at least another season, or two, but I’m mindful of the shooting-demands – although perhaps his influence is to help bed-in the next show-runner

    • Thanks so much! I think there is certainly room – perhaps even season arcs – to explore why Capaldi. Especially since we’ve gotten the explanation of so many Claras. There is a case they are thematically linked. The girl with many versions of herself, the man who appears as different people. I wouldn’t want a regen so quick, but I think even if he regenerated into a new Doctor, Capaldi could return once we know the why behind his particular embodiment of The Doctor – he could appear as a 49th century accountant, like he was a Roman stone merchant? Stylistically it would be a call back to River Song’s order of appearances, but a reversal to her trajectory (death to life). As for this season, I think there are many aspects of his performance that are praiseworthy and have me wanting more, and he certainly has the gravitas and impishness of previous incarnations. However, I have reservations about what the writers are getting him to say and act out, which seem out of character given (most of) the last 8+ years. Thanks again! More deep thoughts to consider:)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.